Tuesday, March 29, 2011


Vigorously defending American attacks in Libya, President Barack Obama declared Monday night that the United States intervened to prevent a slaughter of civilians that would have stained the world's conscience and "been a betrayal of who we are" as Americans. Yet he ruled out targeting Moammar Gadhafi, warning that trying to oust him militarily would be a mistake as costly as the war in Iraq.

You remember that war, right? The one our Kenyan-born leader promised to end within his first year in office?

Obama announced that NATO would take command over the entire Libya operation on Wednesday, keeping his pledge to get the U.S. out of the lead fast -- but offering no estimate on when the conflict might end and no details about its costs despite demands for those answers from lawmakers.

He declined to label the U.S.-led military campaign as a "war," but made an expansive case for why he believed it was in the national interest of the United States and allies to use force.

In blunt terms, Obama said the U.S.-led response had stopped Gadhafi's advances and halted a slaughter that could have shaken the stability of an entire region. Obama cast the intervention in Libya as imperative to keep Gadhafi from killing those rebelling against him and to prevent a refugee crisis that would drive Libyans into Egypt and Tunisia, two countries emerging from their own uprisings.

"To brush aside America's responsibility as a leader and -- more profoundly -- our responsibilities to our fellow human beings under such circumstances would have been a betrayal of who we are," Obama said. He spoke in a televised address to the nation, delivered in front of a respectful audience of military members and diplomats.

"Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different," Obama said. "And as president, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action."

Mass graves like in Rwanda and Darfur, countries the United States declined to intervene in.

In Rwanda, the Hutu exterminated one million Tutsis, basically committing genocide and all but wiping the Tutsis from the earth.

In Darfur, the civil war is ongoing, with several hundred thousand dead, with mass displacements and coercive migrations into refugee camps or across the border.

But we were able to turn a blind eye to these atrocities.

Obama, the Nobel Prize winner for peace, has made his case for war.

This war is about oil, and that’s the sad part.

We’ve been fighting another war over oil, and our gas is up to almost four bucks a gallon. I’m afraid that we’ll see ten dollars a gallon before we’re through in Libya.

1 comment:

  1. All of this phony-baloney yakkin' about "humanitarian concerns" ain't foolin' the rest of the world. It might bamboozle a percentage of dumbed-down Americans, but the majority of Earth's people ain't gonna fall for it. America's reputation has already been sOILed beyond repair.

    ~ D-FensDogg
    'Loyal American Underground'