Carly Rae Jepsen has canceled a concert appearance for the
Boy Scouts of America because of her opposition to the organization's
controversial policy banning openly gay members.
The 27 year-old Canadian singer announced her withdrawal
from July's National Scout Jamboree on Twitter, tweeting her support of the
"ongoing battle for gay rights" as "an artist who believes in
equality for all people."
Really? She tweeted her withdrawal?
How unprofessional is that?
Apparently Jepsen, who has questionable musical talent at
best, recognizes she would only find an audience in the Boy Scouts because
teenage boys would want to masturbate to her (because I promise you, no teenage
boy is listening to “Call Me Maybe” unless his girlfriend is making him).
Or unless he’s gay.
So maybe this is a ploy to find an audience who, while being
male, would listen to her because they identify with her.
Never mind, that for more than a century the Boy Scouts have been an
organization based on Christian values.
And while I am not passing judgment on anyone’s sexual
preference, every translation of the Bible I have ever seen documents pretty
clearly what the Christian view is on homosexuality.
So a ban on homosexuals in the Boy Scouts should not be a stretch of the imagination to anyone.
So a ban on homosexuals in the Boy Scouts should not be a stretch of the imagination to anyone.
Jepsen's cancellation comes on the heels of another Jamboree
headliner's tentative dropping out: the band Train said yesterday that they
would only play the July concert if the Boy Scouts of America makes “the right
decision before then,"a reference to a meeting in May, when the policy
will go up for a vote.
In protesting the Boy Scouts' policy, both Jepsen and Train
acknowledged a petition on Change.org that encouraged them to remove themselves
from the concert's lineup. The petition, started by the Gay & Lesbian
Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), has supporters that number in the tens of
thousands.
I wonder-how could Ms. Jepsen, or Train, or Change.org or
GLAAD or the tens of thousands of supporters respect the Boy Scouts America if they were to change their stance (i.e. SELL OUT) simply to attract musical
entertainment to an event?
The gay lobby has no cajones.
That means balls, in case you don't speak Spanish.
They are, simply put, cowards who have a gang mentality-"if I can't have it, I'll screw it up for everyone else!"
That means balls, in case you don't speak Spanish.
They are, simply put, cowards who have a gang mentality-"if I can't have it, I'll screw it up for everyone else!"
Many of the finest country clubs in America were started because Jews were not admitted to WASP country clubs.
So the Jews said, "F#@K the WASPs, we'll start our own clubs and they'll be better!"
And they were.
If there is such a demand for gay youth to join the Boy Scouts, that sounds to me like an (no pun intended) untapped market.
Why doesn't GLAAD put their energy into a marketing campaign for a new scouting organization?
Then Carly Rae and Patrick Monahan could be scoutmasters in the happy new Gay Scouts of America venture!
Then Carly Rae and Patrick Monahan could be scoutmasters in the happy new Gay Scouts of America venture!
But the left does not work that way.
It's too much effort to build, when you can much more easily destroy.
It's too much effort to build, when you can much more easily destroy.
As usual, this is about the gay lobby simply trying to get
their way, destroying any organization that does not pander to them.
Yet, gays wonder where resentment towards their lifestyle
choice comes from.
I've said this before-true Christians should be the least of GLAAD’s concerns!
True Christians do not beat gays up.
True Christians pray for them!
So the Boy Scouts instilling Christian values in young men
is a plus for the gay movement-there are less angry homophobic adults gunning for them and more True Christians praying for them!
The Boy Scouts are not defaming homosexuals
by not allowing open gay members.
They are exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT to freedom of assembly, hand in hand with their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to
freedom of religion.
I recognize that GLAAD also has the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to protest.
But I believe they should rethink where they expend their efforts.
And maybe a little respect for different points of view might be in order.
But I'm not holding my breath for that.
But I believe they should rethink where they expend their efforts.
And maybe a little respect for different points of view might be in order.
But I'm not holding my breath for that.
I’m exercising my CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to tell them to stop
getting their panties in a bunch and grow the hell up!




