Sebelius made the admission during a Senate Finance Committee
hearing, the second time in a week she was on Capitol Hill, forced to
defend the problem-plagued ObamaCare website.
“Isn’t it true that there is no federal requirement for
navigators to undergo a criminal background check,” Cornyn asked her.
“That is true,” Sebelius answered. “States could add in
additional background checks and other features, but it is not part of the
federal requirement.”
Cornyn pressed, “So a convicted felon could be a navigator
and could acquire sensitive personal information from an individual unbeknownst
to them?”
Sebelius answered, “This is possible.”
The last time Sebelius testified before a House committee,
she fell on the sword, personally apologizing for the failures.
“Hold me accountable for the debacle,” she said. “I’m
responsible.”Lawmakers from both parties have harshly criticized the health insurance exchange website rollout and her agency’s lack of foresight about the massive problems.
“In short, Madam Secretary, I believe you were given advice,
counsel and warning from experts inside your agency and out that the health
care exchanges were not going to be ready. Furthermore, I believe to protect
the administration, you chose to ignore these warnings, and as a result, you
have put our entire health care system and one-sixth of our economy in
jeopardy.”
“You have said America should hold you for — accountable,
which is why today, Madam Secretary, I repeat my request for you to resign,” he
said.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced the
abrupt retirement of the chief information officer, in the first high-level
departure since the botched HealthCare.gov launch last month.
In my opinion, the computer glitches should not be the focus.
In the past, I’d have said the focus should be the
constitutionality of the bill, but quite frankly, today’s admission concerns
me.
The idea that my employer is required by the federal
government to perform background checks on all employees who handle personal
health information (we subcontract with Medicare health plans), but the federal
government does not impose the same requirement on their own employees is one I
find very alarming.
With identity theft as rampant as it is, we're not going to screen who we allow to access our citizen's personal information?
Doesn't that seem a little short-sighted?
Can't this administration do anything right the first time?
Everything is going according to plan... including the Republican outrage at the way the un-Constitutional national healthcare plan is being rolled out. It's actually a BEAUTIFUL bit of theater, when you learn to see it for what it really is and learn to appreciate all the GREAT acting!
ReplyDeleteHollywood has A LOT to learn from Washington!
~ D-FensDogg
'Loyal American Underground'
Another one gets thrown under the bus. What they need to do is fill up a bunch of buses with the guys in Washington and drive them all off a cliff.
ReplyDeleteI don't know that giving convicted felons access to personal data is any more disturbing that having unconvicted felons running the government.
Lee
Tossing It Out
I missed this one when you wrote it. I agree with Mr. Bird's assessment of the situation as stated above AND Mr. McCarthy's comments. It is a beautiful bit of theatre when you can stand back and watch it objectively.
ReplyDelete